Why is it that when someone tells the truth the MSM calls them polarizing? ("Gingrich reminded conservative activists why he was one of the nation's most polarizing leaders in the 1990s, opening the Southern Republican Leadership Conference with a biting assessment of Obama's policies.") Polarizing according to whom? Who is making this judgement and why? (This was actually Fox News, not the New York Times!) Why can't they simply debate the so called polarizing statement on it's merits? When Newt Gingrich says that Barack Obama is "the most radical president in American history", he is absolutely right. So why is that polarizing? What are the opposing poles? The Democrats and Republicans? There's not enough difference between the two for the word polarizing to be appropriate, for any polarizing to be going on. We basically have a one party system and no free press, so where does the polarizing come in? Who is being polarized?
How about the polarization between those of us who are paying attention and those of us who are not? Or the polarization between those who are telling the truth and those who are liars? Or between those of us who love our country and those who are trying to destroy it? The truth of what is going on in America lies outside of the box in which liberals and conservatives, Republicans and Democrats, have framed this debate.
The truth is that we are currently living under a fascist dictatorship and that there is no free press left to report it. All the sources of information available to us are controlled by the government except what truth you can still find on the internet and the FCC wants to control that also.
The saddest part of what is happening to America is that many Americans don't care. As long as they can go to WalMart today and get their free Obamacare tomorrow, they could care less if America goes to hell.
What needs to happen is for We The People to get involved and use the ballot box to overthrow this government and take America back.
0 comments:
Post a Comment